home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=89TT2237>
- <title>
- Aug. 28, 1989: Poland:An Epochal Shift
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1989
- The New USSR And Eastern Europe
- Aug. 28, 1989 World War II:50th Anniversary
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- WORLD, Page 16
- An Epochal Shift
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>Communism yields as Wojciech Jaruzelski asks Solidarity to
- head a government
- </p>
- <p>By Marguerite Johnson
- </p>
- <p> For months, Poland's Communist Party had been losing its
- grip on power. Beset by strikes, debt ridden, repudiated by an
- overwhelming majority of voters in elections in June, the
- regime was drained of the ability to govern. After more than 40
- years in power, the old order staggered toward its demise. And
- yet the alternative seemed inconceivable. Never in Europe's
- postwar history had a Communist government handed authority over
- to a non-Communist opposition.
- </p>
- <p> Suddenly last week, the inconceivable happened. After a
- spate of parliamentary maneuvering by the Solidarity
- trade-union movement, President Wojciech Jaruzelski, who smashed
- Solidarity in 1981 and interned its leader, Lech Walesa, along
- with more than 6,000 other members, was forced to turn to his
- foes to form a government. Jaruzelski asked Tadeusz Mazowiecki,
- 62, a Solidarity lawyer and journalist, to become the first
- non-Communist Prime Minister in the Soviet bloc since 1948 and
- to head up a ruling coalition.
- </p>
- <p> At week's end Walesa and Mazomet in Gdansk to plan their
- next steps. At the same time, the Central Committee of the
- Communist Party, officially known as the Polish United Workers'
- Party, convened in Warsaw to discuss Jaruzelski's move. Poland's
- official news agency, P.A.P., reported that the President will
- send the Prime Minister's name to the Sejm, or lower house of
- parliament, early this week for ratification.
- </p>
- <p> Although Mazowiecki's appointment opened a new chapter in
- Polish history, the Communists still retained formidable power.
- Even before Mazowiecki was tapped by the President, Solidarity
- told the Communists they would continue to hold the key Defense
- and Interior Ministry--and perhaps the Foreign Ministry--portfolios in any new government, and Walesa assured Moscow that
- Poland would remain a member of the Warsaw Pact. The Communists
- also retained their monopoly on positions within the bloated
- bureaucracy.
- </p>
- <p> Nonetheless, last week's seismic developments in Poland
- reverberated from Moscow to Washington and beyond. The Kremlin
- said Jaruzelski's decision was Poland's business, but the
- success--or failure--of a government led by a non-Communist
- in Warsaw is bound to have an impact on Mikhail Gorbachev's
- political reforms in the Soviet Union. The West applauded
- carefully, wary that too hearty a response might be considered
- meddling that could unbalance the delicate experiment. "We would
- encourage a non-Communist government in the process of
- pluralism, of course," said presidential spokesman Marlin
- Fitzwater. But George Bush "would not want to do anything or say
- anything to upset the applecart."
- </p>
- <p> In the past, said Adrian Hyde-Price of London's Royal
- Institute of International Affairs, "the Soviets would have
- invaded by now." This time, most Western analysts are convinced,
- Moscow will allow Poland to try a pluralistic approach--as
- long as the new, Solidarity-led government honors its pledge not
- to leave the Warsaw Pact. "As long as Gorbachev is in power,
- there will be no direct interference," predicted Hartmut
- Jaeckel, a Polish specialist at the Free University of Berlin.
- </p>
- <p> Above all, the events were a remarkable victory for Walesa
- and for Solidarity, only four months ago a banned organization.
- The daring and imagination that led to the dramatic developments
- came largely from Walesa, who shrewdly seized an opportunity to
- precipitate the change in government by wooing away the
- Communists' junior parliamentary partners. Walesa then wisely
- refrained from seeking the Prime Minister's job himself,
- preferring to work behind the scenes and perhaps eventually make
- a bid for the presidency.
- </p>
- <p> The turning point came in June, when Solidarity won an
- overwhelming victory in Poland's most open elections in four
- decades. The trade-union movement took all 161 seats it was
- allowed to contest in the Sejm, and 99 of the 100 seats in the
- Senate. Even so, the Communist Party and its allies, principally
- the United Peasants' Party and the Democratic Party, retained
- 299 seats in the 460-member Sejm through a reserved list.
- </p>
- <p> But just as the Communists misjudged their standing with
- the electorate, they misjudged their allies. The United Peasants
- and the Democrats, both of which aligned with the Communists
- after World War II, began pondering their own future in light
- of Solidarity's sweep. Some of their Deputies began arguing for
- a break with the regime, to build a political base independent
- of the Communists in time for the next elections. On July 19 the
- National Assembly elected Jaruzelski as President, but only with
- the help of seven senior Solidarity parliamentarians. Eleven
- Deputies from the Communist alliance voted against him.
- </p>
- <p> Six days later, Walesa met with Jaruzelski and propose-d
- that Solidarity form a government. The new President said no.
- Instead he invited Solidarity to join a grand coalition
- government headed by the Communists. Walesa refused. Soon
- thereafter Jaruzelski stepped down as Communist Party leader in
- favor of Mieczyslaw Rakowski. The President asked Czeslaw
- Kiszczak, who has been Interior Minister since 1981, to form a
- new government. By Aug. 7, Kiszczak had still been unable to do
- so, and Walesa once again called for a Solidarity-led
- government. This time he pitched his appeal directly to the
- United Peasants and the Democrats.
- </p>
- <p> By then the public's tolerance for political infighting was
- wearing thin. At the same time, a government economic-reform
- plan had taken effect, causing food prices to shoot up
- dramatically. Solidarity leaders recognized that their movement
- would suffer if it stood by while the economy spiraled out of
- control.
- </p>
- <p> The first real crack in the Communist facade appeared early
- last week when Kiszczak announced that he was handing over the
- task of forming a government to Roman Malinowski, president of
- the Peasants' Party. Jaruzelski never asked Malinowski to form
- a government; perhaps he calculated that Malinowski would have
- been unacceptable to Solidarity because of his association with
- the 1981 martial-law crackdown.
- </p>
- <p> With Kiszczak preparing to bow out, the Solidarity
- leadership circulated a statement to Peasants' and Democratic
- Deputies calling on them to join in "a government of national
- responsibility under the leadership of Lech Walesa." That same
- night Solidarity legislators and members of the two junior
- partners in the Communist alliance met. Said Walesa: "I want to
- help the reform wings of the Peasants' Party and the Democratic
- Party to get into government and answer the call of the times."
- </p>
- <p> Walesa's appeal won the day. The Deputies approved a
- resolution calling for a Solidarity-led government under
- Walesa's leadership. The new alliance, with a total of 264 seats
- in the Sejm, would thus have a majority over the Communists'
- 173. The next day Walesa, Malinowski and Democratic Party leader
- Jerzy Jozwiak called at Warsaw's Belvedere Palace, now the
- presidential residence. After Kiszczak presented his resignation
- to Jaruzelski, the three party leaders talked with the President
- for two hours.
- </p>
- <p> Solidarity leaders said afterward that Jaruzelski had
- accepted "in principle" their offer to form a government. The
- coalition proposed three Solidarity candidates: Mazowiecki,
- Bronislaw Geremek, the movement's parliamentary leader, and
- Jacek Kuron, a senior adviser. It soon became clear that
- Mazowiecki was Jaruzelski's choice. Said the Prime
- Minister-designate as he rushed from one meeting to another:
- "The most difficult task will be to make people think that
- (life) can be better--even though it cannot be better
- immediately."
- </p>
- <p> That will be a tall order. Warsaw owes more than $39
- billion to the West and 6 billion rubles to Soviet bloc
- countries. Interest payments alone amount to $3.5 billion
- annually. Inflation is running at more than 150% and will
- probably top 200% by year's end. Food supplies are sporadic at
- best. This month more strikes, some backed by Solidarity, have
- further damaged the economy.
- </p>
- <p> Although virtually everyone in Poland recognizes the need
- for economic reforms, the country lacks the money, and has
- failed so far to demonstrate the political will, to make them.
- Old factories and unproductive coal mines must be closed,
- meaning the loss of thousands of jobs. The Communist-dominated
- bureaucracy and army need to be cut back. Most problematical of
- all, as Mazowiecki said, living conditions will have to get even
- worse if they are ever to get better.
- </p>
- <p> In Czechoslovakia, East Germany and Rumania, Solidarity's
- accession is likely to convince the Old Guard Communist regimes
- that any concessions to reform could lead to similar disaster
- for the ruling party. In Prague authorities were girding for the
- 21st anniversary this week of the 1968 Warsaw Pact invasion that
- ended the country's brief liberalization--an intervention that
- Poland's Sejm last week condemned. Said a Western diplomat in
- Budapest last week: "The hard-liners will point to Poland and
- say, `That's where you finish up if you let the opposition get
- a foot in the door.'" In Hungary, where multiparty elections
- are due to be held soon, Geza Jeszenszky, a spokesman for the
- opposition Hungarian Democratic Forum, said the success of a
- Solidarity-led Polish government would probably "increase the
- confidence of the Hungarian voting public."
- </p>
- <p> Solidarity's failure, however, could easily have the
- opposite effect. "Walesa is going to be criticized for certain,"
- predicted Czech-born Zuzana Princova of London's Wharton
- Econometrics Forecasting Associates, "yet a lot of people have
- trust in him and really support him." But if Walesa and
- Mazowiecki are to keep Poland on its historic new course, they
- will also need outside help--from Washington as well as from
- Moscow.
- </p>
- <p>-- John Borrell/Warsaw
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-